[22:36:55] Imperial Guard says:
so if guns are out-lawed
[22:36:59] Imperial Guard says:
I'm allowed to go around
[22:37:01] Imperial Guard says:
with a sword
[22:37:04] Imperial Guard says:
and chop peoples heads off
[22:37:07] Imperial Guard says:
and no one will care
[22:37:08] Imperial Guard says:
right?
LOL, so true! :D
Sword ban. Easy as that.
Quote from: TranceRaver83 on April 11, 2010, 04:52:34 PM
Sword ban. Easy as that.
Noooo, because they see guns as the only threats in life.
I'm partly serious, too. I was on this REALLY G-rated site, and you couldn't use guns while roleplaying, but swords were fine...
Quote from: Gleech on April 11, 2010, 05:07:41 PM
Noooo, because they see guns as the only threats in life.
I'm partly serious, too. I was on this REALLY G-rated site, and you couldn't use guns while roleplaying, but swords were fine...
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
but srsly oblivion isn't G-rated (jk),
and also, was there any gore? I bet the swords were wooden! XD
CHOP CHOP, FOOLS.
Quote from: Dracoslythe on April 11, 2010, 11:33:09 PM
CHOP CHOP, FOOLS.
+1.
Quote from: ENJACKAL on April 11, 2010, 07:12:14 PM
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
but srsly oblivion isn't G-rated (jk),
and also, was there any gore? I bet the swords were wooden! XD
Um... I think there was just a little bit of blood... that site went down in the dumps.
They banned Imageshack and Photobucket, because someone saw a 'non-G-rated ad'
All the screen shot story (Basically comic) makers raged at that, since it killed the links to all their pictures.
It's just the way people see it. Which killed more people, guns or swords?
Quote from: Elija2 on April 12, 2010, 08:19:12 AM
It's just the way people see it. Which killed more people, guns or swords?
Do knives count?
RPG > Sword
Quote from: windlessusher on April 12, 2010, 08:32:55 AM
Do knives count?
Kitchen knives, yes. Actual pointy knives, no.
you make a point, gleech, now,
Hitler:EVEYWUN 4 GUN BANZ, RAIZEZ RIIITE HAUUUND
*all but one person raises hand*
me:yeeeaaahh... that's retarded...
Hitler: JEWW!!
nope, i make no sense, but i sureley am at the same time.
If guns are banned and swords are more dangerous, it makes for good sport XD
lizard chopping insted of shooting?
that's just HORRIBLE
i hate the poaching of lizards anyways
Quote from: xaio on April 12, 2010, 04:00:09 PM
lizard chopping insted of shooting?
that's just HORRIBLE
i hate the poaching of lizards anyways
No, HUMAN chopping instead of shooting, it gives you more of a chance, YOU CANT BLOCK A BULLET!
Quote from: Elija2 on April 12, 2010, 08:19:12 AM
It's just the way people see it. Which killed more people, guns or swords?
Swords.
They have killed like, 80,000,000 million
Reason:
Swords were before guns so they had more time to be stabbed through people's hearts.
Quote from: jeexx on April 12, 2010, 05:30:12 PM
Swords.
They have killed like, 80,000,000 million
Reason:
Swords were before guns so they had more time to be stabbed through people's hearts.
Also, swords were more commonplace than guns ever have been, with swords people were more willing to fight, because you can actually block a sword!
Quote from: ENJACKAL on April 12, 2010, 08:45:42 PM
Also, swords were more commonplace than guns ever have been, with swords people were more willing to fight, because you can actually block a sword!
among other things
Quote from: jeexx on April 12, 2010, 05:30:12 PM
Swords.
They have killed like, 80,000,000 million
Reason:
Swords were before guns so they had more time to be stabbed through people's hearts.
and there were bayonets on old-time guns if you got ran up on while reloading
but guns of today kill millions on edge now, you dont see everyone fighting with cutco knives in a war, do you>