why do you think ps3 grapihcs are better?
I'd say they were both pretty much equal :)
And if the PS3 does have better graphics, its probably because of its processor or something... I'm not a techniqual guy :P
They are usually identical. Sometimes better on 360 though. The cell isn't as powerful as Sony says it is.
I find that the PS3 and X360 have similar graphics but the Wii graphics stink
Quote from: shadowinhell2269 on April 03, 2009, 11:38:34 AM
I find that the PS3 and X360 have similar graphics but the Wii graphics stink
wii graphics are AWESOME,just not
as good
And aren't they exactly the say?
And why is this guy accusing that we DO say that they are better? >_>
Quote from: windlessusher on April 03, 2009, 11:46:29 AM
wii graphics are AWESOME,just not as good
And aren't they exactly the say?
And why is this guy accusing that we DO say that they are better? >_>
Sorry, its just my opinion
i always thought they were the same.....all my friends think the PS3 graphics are better....
Quote from: shadowinhell2269 on April 03, 2009, 01:09:00 PM
Sorry, its just my opinion
I wasn't yelling at you :D
Its just how I speak....type....whatever XP
I have only just thought of this...
How can something having better graphics than another thing be opinion? Its a fact if something has better graphics than another thing. Its not a matter of opinion unless you have eye problems or something that makes you see differently. Here is my list:
1. PC
2. PS3 (About the same as 360 but Killzone 2 has better graphics than any 360 game)
3. X360
4. Wii
5. ?????
That is were I get confused. I don't know if XBOX has better gfx than PS2 or GCN.
Xbox has the best graphics in the Sixth-gen, Super Empra.
Quote from: ShadowsOfSilver on April 04, 2009, 02:27:50 AM
Xbox has the best graphics in the Sixth-gen, Super Empra.
Yay! I knew it was XBOX but some people say the GCN had better graphics but the XBOX was more powerful. Now I just need to know if GCN has better gfx than PS2.
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 02:44:22 AM
Yay! I knew it was XBOX but some people say the GCN had better graphics but the XBOX was more powerful. Now I just need to know if GCN has better gfx than PS2.
I'd probably say PS2 if I had to choose ONE, but if I could choose that they have the same, I would.
Its okay windlesssusher
Quote from: ShadowsOfSilver on April 04, 2009, 02:52:59 AM
I'd probably say PS2 if I had to choose ONE, but if I could choose that they have the same, I would.
They are about the same. PS2 and GCN hardware is very very different so that makes it really difficult to compare them. Sonic games on GCN had better gfx but many games had better gfx on PS2. Here is my final list:
1. PC
2. PS3
3. X360
4. Wii
5. XBOX
6. GCN (CPU was faster and less confusing so games on GCN needed less effort)
7. PS2
8. DC
9. PSP
10. N64 (I am am 80% sure that N64 has better gfx than the DS)
I thought N64 gfx and DS gfx were the same :-\
Quote from: windlessusher on April 04, 2009, 07:23:28 AM
I thought N64 gfx and DS gfx were the same :-\
DS graphics have very jagged edges and the resolution is lower.
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 05:21:46 AM
10. N64 (I am am 80% sure that N64 has better gfx than the DS)
Incorrect. DS has better gfx than the N64 EVER could have had.
Quote from: ShadowsOfSilver on April 04, 2009, 08:09:01 AM
Incorrect. DS has better gfx than the N64 EVER could have had.
Are you sure. DS runs at a much lower res. It graphics are also quite jagged.
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 08:13:28 AM
Are you sure. DS runs at a much lower res. It graphics are also quite jagged.
Yes. Just compare N64 Super Mario 64 to DS Super Mario 64.
Quote from: ShadowsOfSilver on April 04, 2009, 08:16:01 AM
Yes. Just compare N64 Super Mario 64 to DS Super Mario 64.
The graphics are kinda pixelated on the DS version.
Quote from: ShadowsOfSilver on April 04, 2009, 08:16:01 AM
Yes. Just compare N64 Super Mario 64 to DS Super Mario 64.
N64 is better 8)
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 05:21:46 AM
They are about the same. PS2 and GCN hardware is very very different so that makes it really difficult to compare them. Sonic games on GCN had better gfx but many games had better gfx on PS2. Here is my final list:
1. PC
2. PS3
3. X360
4. Wii
5. XBOX
6. GCN (CPU was faster and less confusing so games on GCN needed less effort)
7. PS2
8. DC
9. PSP
10. N64 (I am am 80% sure that N64 has better gfx than the DS)
The PS3 is bette than a computers game
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 08:18:51 AM
The graphics are kinda pixelated on the DS version.
Not to me.
They look the same >.>
I prefer the PC anyways
It's been proven that Xbox 360 graphics are in fact better than PS3 graphics.
Quote from: windlessusher on April 04, 2009, 08:29:08 AM
N64 is better 8)
Actually it's been said that the DS version looks better, but the controls on the DS version are a bit weird for a game that used the N64 control pad.
Being a 360 owner I find that good news, Nightmare, but what proof do you have? (For the record, I've never liked the Playstation brand. I can't get past those dumb symbols on the buttons. ;D)
Quote from: KevChaos86 on April 04, 2009, 05:20:50 PM
Being a 360 owner I find that good news, Nightmare, but what proof do you have? (For the record, I've never liked the Playstation brand. I can't get past those dumb symbols on the buttons. ;D)
why the hate on the X Box 360 and Triangle? :(
What are you saying wind? I was saying that Nightmare's statement about 360's graphics being better than PS3 was a good thing since I own a 360 myself... and that I never liked Playstation.
Quote from: KevChaos86 on April 04, 2009, 05:20:50 PM
For the record, I've never liked the Playstation brand. I can't get past those dumb symbols on the buttons. ;D
I was commenting on that :P
Ah. Well, those symbols mess me up since I'm so used to using buttons with letters on them. Anyway, let me explain. I went right from Dreamcast to the original Xbox cuz alot of the DC's games were revived on it, and cuz the controller is very similar to the Dreamcast's. And cuz of all the awesome games for it. ;D
Quote from: shadowinhell2269 on April 04, 2009, 02:26:59 PM
The PS3 is bette than a computers game
The PS3's graphics are no where near PC. My PC can produce PS3 graphics and it ain't even good. Imagine what a ATI HD4870 could do.
Quote from: NiGHTMaRE on April 04, 2009, 05:14:58 PM
It's been proven that Xbox 360 graphics are in fact better than PS3 graphics.
How exactly? If its multiplatform games that look better on 360...
Thats because they were made on 360 and ported to PS3. The bestest looking PS3 which is Killzone 2 easily eats any 360 game in graphics.
Quote from: windlessusher on April 04, 2009, 07:42:00 PM
why the hate on the X Box 360 and Triangle? :(
Ha ha ha... "X" "Box (square)" "360 (circle)" and "Triangle" :D
Quote from: Super Empra on April 04, 2009, 02:44:22 AM
Yay! I knew it was XBOX but some people say the GCN had better graphics but the XBOX was more powerful. Now I just need to know if GCN has better gfx than PS2.
When I play a video game I'm interested in the gameplay not graphics
Quote from: KevChaos86 on April 04, 2009, 08:53:43 PM
Ah. Well, those symbols mess me up since I'm so used to using buttons with letters on them. Anyway, let me explain. I went right from Dreamcast to the original Xbox cuz alot of the DC's games were revived on it, and cuz the controller is very similar to the Dreamcast's. And cuz of all the awesome games for it. ;D
For me,I started out with a Playstation,carried onto PS2 then PSP then PS3,so I'm used to the controls,the Xbox controller confuses me @_@
I can't play with letters DX thats why I FAIL at ma DS.
SONY FTW!Even their T.V.'s kick ass
Ah, I hear ya wind. You're simply of the "Playstation Generation", that's all. I've been gaming ever since the original Nintendo. It was always letter buttons for me. For the record, I can still kick ass in Tony Hawk 3, even playing on the PS2. ;D
Quote from: KevChaos86 on April 05, 2009, 01:30:32 PM
Ah, I hear ya wind. You're simply of the "Playstation Generation", that's all. I've been gaming ever since the original Nintendo. It was always letter buttons for me. For the record, I can still kick ass in Tony Hawk 3, even playing on the PS2. ;D
So I guess its my loss :(
Nah, you still have emulators wind. ;) Anyway, you grow up enjoying what you know. Did those games bring good memories & experiences with them? If so, that's all that counts. :D
I would say 360, then again I'm biased XD
For me it went like
Game boy-PS1-GBA-PS2/360/GC-360
I had a PS2, Xbox, and GC.
Go me.
I'm sorry but I'm so ANNOYED by that question. Nearly everyone in my class is discussing that ALL THE TIME! O_o
But I think PS3 has the best graphics
Yeah, I think PS3 has better graphics than the 360.
How can you tell the difference? @_@
Quote from: windlessusher on April 09, 2009, 11:26:41 AM
How can you tell the difference? @_@
You gotta have two tv's close to each other and play a game for both platforms, and then try different other same games. And also, use some HD-glasses which detects any differenses. The HD-glasses are only available in Mobius though...
Quote from: windlessusher on April 09, 2009, 11:26:41 AM
How can you tell the difference? @_@
Put them both in HD, and play their respective games that have the best graphics (PS3=Metal Gear Solid 4. 360: Gears of War or any recent FPS) and you will see the difference.
Quote from: Aorokusho on April 09, 2009, 12:23:53 PM
Put them both in HD, and play their respective games that have the best graphics (PS3=Metal Gear Solid 4. 360: Gears of War or any recent FPS) and you will see the difference.
Then I must be blind,cause I see no difference :-\
They both look realistic to me
Quote from: windlessusher on April 09, 2009, 02:32:00 PM
Then I must be blind,cause I see no difference :-\
They both look realistic to me
I think that I'm blind too.
In fact, this message was typed by an interpreter. XD
Seriously, though, I don't see too much difference...depends on the game really.
Both consoles are very good i check their atributes and they are both very good!
Quote from: Aorokusho on April 09, 2009, 12:23:53 PM
Put them both in HD, and play their respective games that have the best graphics (PS3=Metal Gear Solid 4. 360: Gears of War or any recent FPS) and you will see the difference.
Then PS3 would win because Killzone 2 easily beats any 360 game in graphics. But its not really a fair way of comparing them.
a have a wii but is not the better graphic is good but not like the ps3 or xbox360
The graphics varies very from which game producer the game is actually from, and there are certain requirements for the graphics sometimes (a good driver maybe is needed and some other times there is something else). But still, it mostly depends on the game producers.
Quote from: windlessusher on April 09, 2009, 02:32:00 PM
Then I must be blind,cause I see no difference :-\
They both look realistic to me
Same here their is no difference
i think there about equal
ok i did a little studyin
[from "How stuff Works]
The PS3 "Processing Element" of the Cell is a 3.2-GHz PowerPC core equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache. The PowerPC core is a type of microprocessor similar to the one you would find running the Apple G5. It's a powerful processor on its own and could easily run a computer by itself; but in the Cell, the PowerPC core is not the sole processor. Instead, it's more of a "managing processor." It delegates processing to the eight other processors on the chip, the Synergistic Processing Elements.
360
Xenon is a CPU that is used in the Xbox 360 game console. The processor, internally codenamed "Waternoose" by IBM[1] and "XCPU" by Microsoft, is based on IBM's PowerPC instruction set architecture, consisting of three independent processor cores on a single die. These cores are slightly modified versions of the PPE in the Cell processor which was designed specifically for the PlayStation 3.[2][3] Each core has two symmetric hardware threads (SMT), for a total of six hardware threads available to games. Each individual core also includes 32 KiB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KiB of L1 data cache.
i did a little more in depth studying and i came out with this result:
Playstation 3 was built for graphics and realistic gameplay
Xbox 360 was built for downloadable content and straight down FUN gaming
but in my opinion 360 is the best XD
Quote from: XtheHedgehog on May 19, 2009, 10:10:23 AM
ok i did a little studyin
[from "How stuff Works]
The PS3 "Processing Element" of the Cell is a 3.2-GHz PowerPC core equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache. The PowerPC core is a type of microprocessor similar to the one you would find running the Apple G5. It's a powerful processor on its own and could easily run a computer by itself; but in the Cell, the PowerPC core is not the sole processor. Instead, it's more of a "managing processor." It delegates processing to the eight other processors on the chip, the Synergistic Processing Elements.
360
Xenon is a CPU that is used in the Xbox 360 game console. The processor, internally codenamed "Waternoose" by IBM[1] and "XCPU" by Microsoft, is based on IBM's PowerPC instruction set architecture, consisting of three independent processor cores on a single die. These cores are slightly modified versions of the PPE in the Cell processor which was designed specifically for the PlayStation 3.[2][3] Each core has two symmetric hardware threads (SMT), for a total of six hardware threads available to games. Each individual core also includes 32 KiB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KiB of L1 data cache.
i did a little more in depth studying and i came out with this result:
Playstation 3 was built for graphics and realistic gameplay
Xbox 360 was built for downloadable content and straight down FUN gaming
but in my opinion 360 is the best XD
The cell is a confusing CPU and devs still haven't fully used the power. Thats why i think the 360's CPU is better.
Ps3 is more better!
Everything in PS3 looks so realistic (For me).
Quote from: Skyle369 on May 19, 2009, 09:42:57 PM
Ps3 is more better!
Everything in PS3 looks so realistic (For me).
More better? nvm...
I personally think the PS3 is CAPABLE of better graphics, due to the power of the cell processor. It's just that with Multi-Platform games, no developer makes separate versions for PS3 and 360. As for exclusives, No PS3 game developer ever spent too much time on graphics, they notice that PS3 needs more games with great gameplay before they work on graphics.
Quote from: XtheHedgehog on May 19, 2009, 10:10:23 AM
ok i did a little studyin
[from "How stuff Works]
The PS3 "Processing Element" of the Cell is a 3.2-GHz PowerPC core equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache. The PowerPC core is a type of microprocessor similar to the one you would find running the Apple G5. It's a powerful processor on its own and could easily run a computer by itself; but in the Cell, the PowerPC core is not the sole processor. Instead, it's more of a "managing processor." It delegates processing to the eight other processors on the chip, the Synergistic Processing Elements.
360
Xenon is a CPU that is used in the Xbox 360 game console. The processor, internally codenamed "Waternoose" by IBM[1] and "XCPU" by Microsoft, is based on IBM's PowerPC instruction set architecture, consisting of three independent processor cores on a single die. These cores are slightly modified versions of the PPE in the Cell processor which was designed specifically for the PlayStation 3.[2][3] Each core has two symmetric hardware threads (SMT), for a total of six hardware threads available to games. Each individual core also includes 32 KiB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KiB of L1 data cache.
i did a little more in depth studying and i came out with this result:
Playstation 3 was built for graphics and realistic gameplay
Xbox 360 was built for downloadable content and straight down FUN gaming
but in my opinion 360 is the best XD
Have you even ever touched a PS3? Most people that say that stuff haven't ever used the other system. Both are just as good as eachother at downloadable content and as for "FUN", that's dependant on the GAME DEVELOPER, not the system itself. Ever try playing Monopoly with a 360 or PS3? It's not fun, they take FOREVER to roll the dice... The games are what make them fun, not the processors. So if you wanna talk about fun, talk about the actual games, not the systems power itself.
The better graphics in the 3 last gen are:
5th Gen: Playstation
6th Gen: Playstaion 2,XBOX is second
7th Gen: PS3 and 360 have the same graphics normally but if you play PS3 on a good SONY TV,you'll see that PS3 have better graphics.
Quote from: LighttheHedgehog on June 04, 2009, 02:27:57 AM
The better graphics in the 3 last gen are:
5th Gen: Playstation
6th Gen: Playstaion 2,XBOX is second
7th Gen: PS3 and 360 have the same graphics normally but if you play PS3 on a good SONY TV,you'll see that PS3 have better graphics.
Actually i don't agree with that. Weren't N64 graphics better than PS1?
5th Gen: N64
6th Gen: PS2? XBOX? GCN? I don't know
7th Gen: PS3 because Killzone 2 has better graphics than any 360 game
at the moment
I still think the Playstation have better graphis than N64.
Quote from: LighttheHedgehog on June 04, 2009, 07:24:54 AM
I still think the Playstation have better graphis than N64.
I found out that N64 had much better graphics. PS1's were quite pixelated. Perfect Dark on N64 looked amazing.
Quote from: Super Empra on June 04, 2009, 07:32:53 AM
I found out that N64 had much better graphics. PS1's were quite pixelated. Perfect Dark on N64 looked amazing.
Yeah, I have to agree, Perfect Dark was by far the best looking first person shooter on the 64. PS1 was very pixelated and some games looked 2D. On the 64, Yoshi's Story looked like some game off of PS1.
PS3 has better graphics for some games but i think the everything else about 360 is better
I usually try to compare and always think the 360's is better
but not by much
PS3 graphics are better then 360's, 100%. It's offical.... If you look at the PlayStation Shop and download God Of War 3 Trailer. On your 1080ip flat screen tv. You will know what i mean.
And main reason because PS3 has Blue-Ray and 360 has HD DVD.
Quote from: Rulep on July 08, 2009, 06:33:10 PM
PS3 graphics are better then 360's, 100%. It's offical.... If you look at the PlayStation Shop and download God Of War 3 Trailer. On your 1080ip flat screen tv. You will know what i mean.
And main reason because PS3 has Blue-Ray and 360 has HD DVD.
Xbox doesn't have HD DVD, its just DVD.
Quote from: MewZero on July 08, 2009, 10:28:42 PM
it has HDDVD.
Games are only DVD
They can play HD-DVDs with the HD DVD Player accessories
Quote from: Sonixz on July 08, 2009, 10:35:47 PM
Games are only DVD
They can play HD-DVDs with the HD DVD Player accessories
no duh.
Well, mine can play HDDVD.
Quote from: Rulep on July 08, 2009, 06:33:10 PM
PS3 graphics are better then 360's, 100%. It's offical.... If you look at the PlayStation Shop and download God Of War 3 Trailer. On your 1080ip flat screen tv. You will know what i mean.
And main reason because PS3 has Blue-Ray and 360 has HD DVD.
Had.
They made an HD DVD player, but they don't make HD DVDs anymore.
They both have equal graphics.That what I think atleast. :-\
I don't :P